Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
1
2015
Deferential Review for District Court Obviousness Determination McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Federal Circuit to Consider International Patent Exhaustion En Banc McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
A Combination Is Not Obvious If It Is Beyond the Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art, and Other Lessons McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Last Week Tonight’ Host John Oliver Ignores the Last Three Years of Patent Reform Mintz
May
1
2015
An Easy First Impression: Joint Dismissal of Appellate Review McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
The “Totality of the Specification” Can Override a District Court’s Factual Findings McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Congress Targets Patent Trolls – Again – With Controversial "Opaque Letters" Act ArentFox Schiff LLP
May
1
2015
No Special Rules Regarding Consideration of Expert Declarations in IPR Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
FDA Finalizes Guidance Documents on Biosimilarity Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
1
2015
Non-Claimed Elements Cannot Transform an Abstract Idea McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
USPTO Implements Quick Fixes to AIA Review Rules McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
1
2015
Financial Product or Service Is Not Just for Financial Service Industry McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Federal Circuit Acknowledges § 284 Review Issue May Be Raised by Octane/Highmark Cases McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Deposition Practice Tips: PTAB Guidance for Dealing With Suspected Witness Coaching Foley & Lardner LLP
May
1
2015
Filing Waiver of Service Triggers One-Year IPR Bar Date McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Square v. Protegrity Corp: Decision on Institution CBM2014-00182 Faegre Drinker
May
1
2015
Payment Information Does Not Necessarily Make a CBM McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Hughes Network and Hughes Communications v. California Institute of Technology: Decision Denying Institution IPR2015-00060 Faegre Drinker
May
1
2015
Conventional Use of Computer Not Enough to Overcome Alice McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
Petitioners Must Present Sufficient Evidence to Establish Inherency Mintz
Apr
30
2015
Microsoft Corp v. Enfish: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00559 Faegre Drinker
Apr
30
2015
Specific Application Will Not Avoid Ineligibility Unless Required by the Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
IPR Privity Analysis Includes Post-Complaint Period McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Mere Receipt of a Copy of the Complaint Does Not Invoke the One-Year Bar Rule McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Why the Grace Period Restoration Act Is a Bad Idea Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
30
2015
PTAB: We Are Disinclined to Acquiesce to Your Rehearing Request McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
30
2015
Nearly Expired Is Not the Same as Expired: The Board Clarifies Claim Construction Standards for Inter Partes Review McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins