Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
31
2015
Two Prong Protection is the Best Approach for Product Configuration Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
31
2015
SDI Technologies, Inc., v. Bose Corp.: In an IPR, Issue Preclusion Does Not Attach Until Appeal Rights Are Exhausted McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Medtronic v. Robert Bosch Healthcare: Granting Motions to Seal Tailored to Confidential Information Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2015
Federal Circuit Clarifies Standard for Prior Art in Obviousness Analysis Mintz
Jul
31
2015
Samsung Austin Semiconductor, LLC v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP: Use of § 325(d) Discretion Can Lead to Harsh Result McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Skimlinks, Inc. and Skimbit, Ltd. v. Linkgine, Inc.: Successful Joinder in CBM Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Markman Ruling Construes “Network” Rejecting Parties' Proposals Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
31
2015
Another Federal Trade Secret Protection Bill Introduced Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jul
31
2015
Upcoming Implementation of the Italian Patent Box Regime McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
PTAB Institutes Very First Post-Grant Review (PGR) McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 31, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
31
2015
A Kinder, Gentler PTAB Allows Claim Amendments: REG Synthetic Fuels LLC v. Neste Oil Oyj McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Timing Is Everything—Objective Evidence of Bona Fide Intent to Use Necessary at the Time of Filing Application McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC: Covered Business Patents Jurisdiction Continues to Develop McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Delivering Architectural Plans May Create Implied License McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
USPTO Provides Meaningful Direction on Patentable Subject Matter Eligibility Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
30
2015
Keep the Petitions Concise: Apple v. Contentguard Holdings McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Patent Office Publishes Subject Matter “Update”
Jul
30
2015
Trademarks in the Crosshairs: Non-Trademark Use of a Descriptive Term McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Connecticut Court Sinks Claim That History Of American Submarine Infringes Copyright Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
30
2015
No Copyright in Individual Contributions to a Film McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Could Bieb Be a Copyright Infringer? McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Six Key Takeaways from ICANN 53 in Buenos Aires Katten
Jul
30
2015
No Deference by the Federal Circuit to Lower Courts’ Claim Construction Findings McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Teva Review Standard Controls Lighting Ballast on Remand McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Expert Testimony Not Always a Guarantee for Appellate Review with Deference McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
Microsoft Corp., v. Proxyconn, Inc.: Patent Trial and Appeal Board Claim Construction Cannot Be Unreasonable McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
30
2015
OIP Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. - Price Optimization in E-Commerce Not Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins