Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
5
2015
Texas Association of Realtors v. Property Disclosure Technologies, LLC, Denying Institution for Lack of Standing CBM2015-00069 Faegre Drinker
Aug
5
2015
To Apple, Love Taylor: Apple Responds with Royalties IMS Legal Strategies
Aug
4
2015
Throwing the First Legal Punch – An Introduction to Cease and Desist Letters Horwood Marcus & Berk Chartered
Aug
4
2015
Professor Eisenberg Analyzes the 101 Exception for Patents Claiming Diagnostic
Aug
4
2015
Ninth Circuit is the First Appeals Court to Rule on RAND-SEP Licensing McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
4
2015
Qualtrics v. OpinionLab: Final Written Decision Concluding that Patent Marking did not Support Alleged Commercial Success IPR2014-00356 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2015
Nanoco Tech. v. Massachusetts Institute of Tech: Institution Granted in Part Where Exclusive Licensee Was Not a Real Party-in-Interest IPR2015-00532 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2015
Georgia Federal Judge Ross Examines Morass of Pleadings and Refines Dispute to Supported Claims of Patent, Copyright, and Trade Dress Infringement Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
4
2015
Bipartisan Trade Secrets Legislation Is Back Covington & Burling LLP
Aug
4
2015
Individual Inventor Alleges Eli Lilly and BDA Overdosed on Patented Dosage Adherence Tool Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
4
2015
Delaware District Court Finds Enhanced Patent Indefiniteness Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
3
2015
Planning for Potential Significant Tax Breaks Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Aug
3
2015
Georgia Southern Mills Files Patent Suit Against Int’l Textiles over its Glide™ Product Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
3
2015
In Mexico: Can the Minimum Period of 5 Years Established by NAFTA for Regulatory Data Exclusivity be Extended for Biological Medical Products? Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
3
2015
No En Banc Review of Panel Decision Vacating a Civil Contempt Remedy McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
3
2015
Inventorship, Ownership Issues Cause Dismissal of Suit Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
2
2015
Federal Circuit Throws Out a Willful Infringement Verdict Due to Lack of Standing McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
2
2015
Apple Inc. v. VirnetX Inc., IPR2014-00403 Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable Faegre Drinker
Aug
1
2015
Speedtrack Inc. v. Office Depot, Inc.: Empowering Customers to Sell an Exonerated Accused Product McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
1
2015
Is "New Vintage" On the Way Out? Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
1
2015
In Seeking Patent Review, Timing Matters: GTNX v. INTTRA McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
When a Divisional Is Not a Divisional: No Section 121 Safe Harbor for Reissue Patentee Who Retroactively Omitted New Matter McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Third Circuit Extends Actavis to Reverse Settlement Agreements Involving Non-Cash Consideration McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Poor Litigation Conduct by Prevailing Party Not Enough to Obviate Exceptional-Case Doctrine McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
July 2015 Update - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
31
2015
Patent Term Adjustment of Parent Application Does Not Extend to Continuation Applications McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
31
2015
Why it Pays to Make Nice with Marketing re: Patent Registration Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
31
2015
Square Inc. v. Protegrity Corp. - What Constitutes a Covered Business Method Patent? McDermott Will & Emery
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins