Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
26
2015
Federal Circuit Upholds ITC Interpretation of § 337 to Cover Induced Infringement: Suprema, Inc. and Mentalix Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
26
2015
Contract Manufacturing Is a Commercial Transaction for Purpose of “On-Sale” Bar The Medicines Company v. Hospira, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
26
2015
Ninth Circuit Is the First Appeals Court to Rule on RAND/SEP Licensing Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
26
2015
Trademarking: Capri Sun Says “Respect the Pouch” IMS Legal Strategies
Aug
26
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 26, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
26
2015
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. v. e-Watch, Inc., Motion for Joinder Granted IPR2015-00611 Faegre Drinker
Aug
26
2015
Chien Luen Industries et al. v. Simon Nicolas Richmond: Denying Patent Owner’s Motion to Terminate IPR2014-00936 Faegre Drinker
Aug
25
2015
Acquisition of HERE – a Prime Example of How IP Can “Drive” Value Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
25
2015
Patent Board’s Proposed New Rules for PTAB Trials Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Aug
25
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 25, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2015
Post-Grant Proceedings: Top Seven Things You Should Know About the Proposed Rule Changes Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
25
2015
PTAB Denies Institution Of Kyle Bass's Ampyra Patent Challenge Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
24
2015
Agila Specialties Inc., et al. v. Cephalon, Inc.: Authorizing Filing of Motion to Disqualify Expert IPR2015-00503 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Customplay v. Clearplay: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable as Obvious IPR2014-00430 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Google v. ContentGuard Holdings: Denial of Institution Where Corresponding MPF Structure Not Identified CBM2015-00040 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
FedEx v. Katz Tech Licensing: Denial of Institution Where Unsworn Declaration Given No Weight CBM2015-00053 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Delaware Judges Are Finding Patent Claims Indefinite Post-Nautilus Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
24
2015
Courts Disagree on Whether Government May Obtain Cell Phone Location Information Without a Warrant Jackson Lewis P.C.
Aug
24
2015
Protecting Diagnostic Innovation – Two Actor Infringement Liability Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
24
2015
Shopkick v. Novitaz: Denying Institution Where no Meaningful Obviousness Analysis is Provided IPR2015-00277, 00278 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Success by Design: A New Option for Expedited Patent Protection in Foreign Countries Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Aug
24
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 24, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
24
2015
Sixth Circuit Gives Copyright Protection To Cheerleading Uniforms Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
24
2015
PTAB Summer Package of Proposed Rule Changes Now Available and Open for Public Comment Mintz
Aug
24
2015
Google Inc. v. SimpleAir - Denying Request for Rehearing Where Petition had Deficiencies CBM2015-00019 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2015
Apple, Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings - Denying Institution Where Patent is a Technological Invention CBM2015-00046 Faegre Drinker
Aug
21
2015
A Royalty By Any Other Name: Post-Expiration Payments After Kimble v. Marvel Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
21
2015
Will New PTAB Rules Impact IPRs Filed By Kyle Bass Hedge Fund? Foley & Lardner LLP
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins