Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright Law Updates

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Sep
30
2015
Claimed Formulation Not Obvious Despite Recitations Falling Within Prior Art Ranges McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
A Primer on Patent Damages: Carnegie Mellon University v. Marvell Technology Group, Ltd., et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Patent Owners: Have an Infringement Claim? Time is (Still) of the Essence Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Sep
30
2015
Claims Obvious Despite Contrary Jury Verdict McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 30, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
30
2015
Clarifying the Post-Nautilus Indefiniteness Standard McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
eBay Inc. v. MoneyCat Ltd: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable CBM2014-00091 Faegre Drinker
Sep
29
2015
Sixth Circuit Court Fashions Hybrid Approach to Determining Whether Garment Designs Are Copyrightable McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2015
Chicken Sandwich Recipe, Name Not Eligible for Copyright Says First Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2015
Royalty Allocations for Royalty Pools Must Be Well Reasoned and Based on a Record McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2015
Motion to Quash Service Is Not a Collateral Order and Therefore Not Appealable McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
29
2015
August 2015 - Summary of Recent Precedential Trademark Trial and Appeal Board Decisions Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
29
2015
Ferrum Ferro Capital v. Allergan Sales: Claim Language Found Limiting in Denying Institution IPR2015-00858 Faegre Drinker
Sep
29
2015
Know Them Before They are Famous (or at least final): The Latest USPTO Proposed Rule Changes Bracewell LLP
Sep
29
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 29, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
29
2015
Boston Scientific Corp. v. UAB Research Foundation, Benefit from Earlier Filing Date Results in Denial of Institution IPR2015-00918 Faegre Drinker
Sep
29
2015
Assessing Commercial Success at the U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board Analysis Group, Inc.
Sep
28
2015
Dot Hill Systems Corp. v. Crossroads Systems: Granting Institution and Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00822 Faegre Drinker
Sep
28
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 28, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
28
2015
Edmund Optics v. Semrock: Final Written Decision Confirming All Challenged Claims IPR2014-00599 Faegre Drinker
Sep
28
2015
Logic, Arguments and Patents Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
28
2015
Enforcing The Phantom Noncompete: Michigan Court Allows Employer To Pursue Noncompete Claim In The Absence Of A Written Document Signed By Employee Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
28
2015
PTAB Refuses To Sanction Kyle Bass Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
28
2015
USPTO Won't Stop Kyle Bass Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
27
2015
AMNEAL PHARMACEUTICALS LLC AND PAR PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. v. JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Granting Motion For Additional Discovery IPR2015-00545 Faegre Drinker
Sep
26
2015
HM ELECTRONICS, INC. v. 3M INNOVATIVE PROPERTIES COMPANY, Denying Joinder Because No Reason Petitioner Could Not Have Presented All Grounds In Single Petition IPR2015-00482 Faegre Drinker
Sep
26
2015
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. v. DEPOMED, INC.Final Written Decision Finding No Claims Unpatentable Because Lack of Reason for Combining Known Features IPR2014-00377 Faegre Drinker
Sep
25
2015
Amgen At It Again – Sues Hospira For Not Wanting To Dance Over Biosimilar Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins