Jun 2 2009 |
A Group Approach To Coping With The Subprime Mortgage Crisis |
|
Jun 7 2013 |
Delaware Court Provides Critical Guidance as to the Commercial Reasonableness of a UCC Article 9 Foreclosure Sale |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 8 2016 |
Delaware Court of Chancery Increases Scrutiny on Disclosure-Only M&A Class Action Settlements |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 15 2021 |
“Winning” Prosecution Arguments Can Invalidate Your Patent As Indefinite |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Sep 26 2011 |
ANDA Automatic Stay of FDA Approval Does Not Defeat Standing in Sham Litigation Antitrust Counterclaim |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 21 2014 |
Delaware Court of Chancery Grants Summary Judgment Dismissing Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claims In Absence of Evidence of Directors’ “Conscious Disregard” of Fiduciary Duties |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 23 2014 |
California Court of Appeal Applies Delaware Law to Deny Discovery in Shareholder Derivative Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 31 2015 |
California and Delaware Courts Agree: Amendments to Corporate Bylaws Do Not Apply Retroactively to Impair Pursuit Previously Accrued Claims |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 19 2017 |
Delaware Supreme Court Confirms Dilution Claims Typically Are Derivative and Are Extinguished After Merger |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 25 2018 |
Not So Fast – Challenges in Reincorporating from California to Delaware |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 26 2019 |
California Court of Appeal Enforces Delaware Forum Selection Bylaw |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 5 2019 |
Delaware Chancery Court Provides Useful Guidance for Protecting Pre-Merger Privileges in Post-Closing Litigation Between Buyers and Sellers |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 19 2020 |
Delaware Supreme Court Confirms That Federal Forum Provision Is Facially Valid, Reversing Court of Chancery |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 28 2020 |
Board Guidance: Getting To Business Judgment Rule Deference When You Have A Controlling Stockholder |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 30 2021 |
Delaware Supreme Court Shines Spotlight on Boilerplate Purchase Agreement Provisions |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 26 2024 |
CFPB and Attorneys General Sue Debt-Relief Enterprise |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 5 2024 |
Delaware Court of Chancery Puts Practitioners on Notice Regarding Voting Formalities Around Merger Agreements |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 11 2010 |
Delaware Chancery Court Dismisses Derivative Plaintiff's Section 220 Books And Records Action |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 17 2011 |
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies When a Series of Dispositions will not Trigger an "All or Substantially All" Indenture Covenant |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 26 2015 |
Delaware Chancery Court Holds that Creditor Plaintiffs in Derivative Suits May Satisfy Standing Requirement by Showing Corporation’s Insolvency at Time of Suit, Regardless of Later Solvency |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 17 2018 |
Getting to Business Judgment in an Interested Transaction: Controlling Stockholder Must Put Procedural Protections in Place Prior to the Commencement of Economic Negotiations |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 4 2020 |
Second Circuit Holds that Registering to do Business in New York Under Section 1301 of the Business Corporation Law Does Not Constitute Consent to General Personal Jurisdiction in New York Courts |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
May 29 2020 |
Delaware Court of Chancery Strictly Construes Right to Discovery of Stockholders Represented By a Contractually Created “Shareholder Representative” |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Aug 18 2020 |
Delaware Court of Chancery Applies the Internal Affairs Doctrine to Deny Stockholder Inspection Rights Under a Foreign State’s Law |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 11 2010 |
When Are Goods Received For The Purpose Of Asserting Administrative Priority Status Under Section 503(b)(9) Of The Bankruptcy Code? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Feb 18 2021 |
Insurance Cybersecurity Certifications: A State Roundup |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 11 2021 |
Delaware Supreme Court Adopts New Three-Prong Test for Demand Futility |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Oct 25 2010 |
Delaware Supreme Court Requires Credible Evidence of a "Proper Purpose" to Review a Corporation's Books and Records |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Dec 12 2011 |
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Relief a Shareholder is Entitled For Inspection of Corporate Books And Records Pursuant To A Section 220 Demand |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Apr 10 2013 |
Delaware and California Courts Split as to Whether a Reverse Triangular Merger Results In an Assignment By Operation of Law, Creating Potential Pitfalls for Delaware and Other Foreign Corporations Located in California |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Mar 27 2014 |
Applying a Legal Bandaid to Defective Acts: Delaware Law Creates New Procedures to Ratify Defective Corporate Acts |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jun 2 2015 |
Back To The Future – Should Stock Incentive Plans Impose Grant Limits on Non-Employee Director Awards? |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jul 10 2017 |
Giving Telemedicine More Room to Breathe: Recent and Pending State and Federal Actions in the World of Online Prescribing |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 3 2018 |
Delaware Supreme Court Imposes New Limits on Stockholder Ratification Defense In Connection With Equity Incentive Plans |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |
Jan 19 2023 |
Buyer Beware: Delaware Declines to Enforce Sale of Business Non-Compete |
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP |