![Robert G. Kidwell Member Mintz DC Antitrust Health Care Enforcement & Investigations Communications Complex Commercial Litigation](https://www.natlawreview.com/sites/default/files/styles/author_profile/public/images/Kidwell_Robert_Mintz.jpg?itok=BCfSi2i8)
Rob’s Washington, DC-based competition and trade regulation practice involves counseling on the regulatory implications of business strategies, regulatory matters, policymaking, and litigation. He defends clients in complex litigation and in merger and regulatory reviews by the US Department of Justice, the Federal Trade Commission, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US, and the Federal Communications Commission. Rob’s clients include media and telecommunications companies, health systems and providers, national retailers, trade associations, and life sciences and technology companies.
Rob counsels a broad range of clients on business and investment strategy, M&A, litigation, and regulatory matters. He specializes in clearly explaining strategic risks and their relative values in order to help senior executives make informed decisions. Rob provides advice to clients from across the country and around the world, in high-profile matters including:
-
Strategic business planning and risk management
-
Antitrust issues in mergers and acquisitions / second requests
-
Complex litigation (class action and otherwise)
-
Regulatory issues arising from foreign investments in U.S. businesses
-
Federal and state regulatory investigations
-
Policy advocacy and notice-and-comment rulemaking
-
Appellate review of agency action
-
Trade association counseling
-
Privacy and data security
-
Unfair/deceptive conduct and false advertising
Rob represents clients in numerous markets, including:
- Media content and distribution
- Wireless communications
- Health care providers and services
- Life sciences
- Technology
- Retail & Consumer Products
- Trade associations and non-profits
He has written and spoken widely on litigation risk management and cost containment, developments in the law, and on issues faced by businesses when they interact with federal and state enforcers and administrative agencies.
Rob is an active supporter of the firm’s pro bono program, providing representation to numerous indigent clients before the Social Security Administration and in local family and domestic relations courts. He has provided corporate and business planning advice to the National Network to End Domestic Violence and other non-profit clients. He is also an active supporter of the firm’s mentoring and sponsorship program.
Prior to his career in the law, Rob was an on-air radio personality and station production director in Lexington, KY.
More Legal and Business Bylines From Robert G. Kidwell
- Tenth Circuit Affirms Class Certification and Price Fixing Verdict Against Dow Chemical - (Posted On Monday, October 06, 2014)
- DOJ Antitrust Enforcers Take to the Bully Pulpit on Prosecuting Antitrust Crimes and Antitrust Compliance Programs - (Posted On Saturday, September 13, 2014)
- No Bones About It: Tenth Circuit Permits Narrowest Market Definition and Raises the Bar for an Entry Defense When Reinstating Monopolization Suit - (Posted On Monday, August 11, 2014)
- Department of Justice (DOJ) Revisits Music Royalty Consent Decrees - (Posted On Thursday, June 05, 2014)
- Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Announces Annual Hart-Scott-Rodino (HSR) Thresholds Revision - (Posted On Friday, January 17, 2014)
- A Book on Books: Southern District of New York (SDNY) Issues 160-Page Opinion Declaring that Apple Violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act by Conspiring to Raise E-Book Prices - (Posted On Tuesday, July 16, 2013)
- Fourth Circuit Holds State Agencies Operated by Market Participants Are Private Actors for State Action Purposes - (Posted On Wednesday, June 12, 2013)
- National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Obtains a Vital Win on Antitrust Challenge of Athletic Aid Rules - (Posted On Wednesday, March 27, 2013)
- Ninth Circuit Clarifies Extraterritorial Reach of California Antitrust Laws - (Posted On Tuesday, February 26, 2013)
- Supreme Court Unanimously Rules Unforeseeability Bars Immunity Defense for Allegedly Anticompetitive Hospital Merger - (Posted On Saturday, February 23, 2013)