Evan J. Seeman concentrates his practice in land use and zoning, real property litigation, and municipal law. Evan offers his clients – including developers, corporations, landowners, municipalities, and advocacy groups – strategic counsel on a broad range of often-complex real estate and land use matters. He works directly with planning professionals to help bring a project across the finish line. Evan is a member of our firm’s Real Estate + Development group.
Land Use – Zoning
Evan assists clients in navigating local, state and federal regulatory requirements for real estate development, helping them secure the necessary permits and approvals. He leads clients in securing zoning map and text amendments, special permits, site plan and subdivision approvals, variances, and wetlands permits. Evan works directly with planning professionals, including certified planners, civil engineers, architects, scientists, and appraisers. He routinely appears before local planning, zoning, and wetlands agencies. Evan utilizes his experience as a past Chair of the Planning & Law Division of the American Planning Association as well as his service on the Executive Board of the CT Chapter of the American Planning Association to undertake projects with a collaborative approach and see them through to completion.
Evan has represented clients in the permitting and development of industrial, manufacturing, commercial, residential, social service, philanthropic, and retail facilities. He obtained special permit approval for a cannabis cultivation and manufacturing operation in Hartford. The project involved the adaptive reuse of an existing 100,000-plus square foot former warehouse facility. Evan recently represented landowners in an application regarding the proposed redevelopment of waterfront property as an outdoor restaurant and beer garden along the Connecticut River. Evan also counsels clients on ways to increase the marketability of property and helps obtain rezoning and text amendment approval to accomplish this goal. He recently obtained text amendment approval to modify a community’s outdated and restrictive business park regulations to facilitate development of approximately 300 acres of vacant land.
Evan also conducts land use due diligence for property acquisitions. He performed such service on behalf of a corporation that acquired property in Fairfield County to be developed with two residential buildings of more than 400 units.
Real Property Litigation
Evan has been involved in dozens of administrative appeals. He successfully argued before the Connecticut Appellate Court a zoning appeal involving a planning and zoning commission's issuance of a special permit to a Greenwich, Connecticut food pantry serving those less fortunate. He advised a planning and zoning commission in Hartford County and subsequently represented them in litigation over an affordable housing application. Evan also successfully argued in Superior Court on behalf of the fourth oldest lighthouse in the United States to permit public tours as a legally permitted non-conforming use. He represented an applicant in reaching a favorable resolution in a wetlands appeal regarding a proposal to provide student housing for a university. He also obtained dismissal of a zoning appeal challenging the re-zoning and special permit approved for youth baseball fields.
Evan handles many other real property disputes. He obtained judgment on behalf of a pharmaceutical client in a quiet title case defending a restrictive covenant that was challenged as an unfair restraint on trade. He is currently representing a property owner in Greenwich in a quiet title action to permit the development of property with affordable housing. Evan also represented a municipality and obtained the dismissal of an injunction action brought by neighboring property owners who contested municipal approval of a 130,000-square-foot ground mounted solar array system to generate energy for a local elementary school.
Evan’s experience includes representing clients in cases involving inverse condemnation, easements, restrictive covenants, First Amendment and equal protection issues, landlord/tenant disputes, and real property tax appeals. Evan also represents property owners in eminent domain matters, challenging both the condemning authority’s right to take property and the authority’s compensation for the property. He represented a landowner whose plans for a mixed-use development were thwarted when part of his land was condemned by a state agency. Evan was part of a team that tried the case and obtained nearly double the amount of damages assessed by the agency (almost $400,000 more in damages). He also has experience in advising condemning authorities in the eminent domain process.
Religious Land Use Litigation
Evan defends municipalities nationwide in cases involving the federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). He advises municipalities on religious land use issues by:
- Revising municipal zoning codes to comply with RLUIPA
- Counseling municipal land use agencies during the zoning application process to avoid or mitigate potential liability
- Defending municipalities in RLUIPA litigation in federal court
Evan has been involved in RLUIPA cases across the country concerning the permitting of a mosque, a rabbinical college, cemetery, and other religious uses. He counseled a Connecticut planning and zoning commission in real-time during the public hearing process to review a special permit application for a religious conference center. He also counseled a small community in the western U.S. regarding a zoning application for a religious ritual bath.
More Legal and Business Bylines From Evan J. Seeman
- Federal Court: “There is no pandemic exception to the Constitution of the United States or the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.” - (Posted On Thursday, May 28, 2020)
- Executive Order to Address Zoning Barriers to Re-opening Restaurants and Retail - (Posted On Friday, May 15, 2020)
- Federal Court: “if beer is ‘essential,’ so is Easter.” - (Posted On Thursday, April 30, 2020)
- Baltimore County’s Zoning Code Found to Violate RLUIPA’s Equal Terms Provision - (Posted On Friday, February 21, 2020)
- Is Finality Still A Requirement For A RLUIPA Action To Be Ripe? - (Posted On Monday, January 13, 2020)
- City of Kirkwood, MO Hits Homerun in Religious Baseball Field Dispute in Eighth Circuit - (Posted On Saturday, December 14, 2019)
- Evangelical Church Sues Castle Hills, TX for Denying SUP for Sunday School Space - (Posted On Monday, December 09, 2019)
- RLUIPA Does Not Apply to Uninsured Amish Roofer Repairing Homeowner’s Damaged Roof - (Posted On Monday, September 23, 2019)
- Fair Housing Act Meets RLUIPA in Georgia - (Posted On Tuesday, August 20, 2019)
- SCOTUS Overrules “State Compensation” Ripeness Requirement for Takings Claims - (Posted On Friday, June 21, 2019)