/>iSalman v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 420 (2016), was one of the most anticipated Supreme Court insider trading cases in almost twenty years. It ended up not being revolutionary, but in reaffirming Dirks v. SEC on the contours of the personal benefit in tipping cases, is still significant. Let's roll the tape . . .
Part 1 - The Insider Trading Cartoon Series Vol. I — Classical Theory
Part 2 - Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. II — Temporary Insiders
Part 3 - The Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. III — Very Temporary Insiders
Part 4 - Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. IV — Rank-and-File Employees [VIDEO]
Part 5 - Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. V — Misappropriation Theory [VIDEO]
Part 6 - Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. VI — Misappropriation (Part Deux) [VIDEO]
Part 7 - Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. VII — Misappropriation Theory (Part the Third)
Part 8 - Negligence Based Charges - The Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. VIII [VIDEO]
Part 9 - Tender Offers - The Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. IX [VIDEO]
Part 10 - Tipping (Pre-Newman): Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. X
Part 11 - Multi-Level Tipping: Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. XI [VIDEO]
Part 12 - Innocent Intermediary: Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. XII [VIDEO]
