House and Senate Tax Bills Propose Changes to Qualified Plans


The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act passed by the US House of Representatives Ways and Means Committee on November 2, and a Description of the Chairman’s Mark of the Tax Cuts & Jobs Act released by the Senate Committee on Finance on November 9, would make sweeping changes to the tax treatment of executive compensation, fringe benefits, and tax-qualified plans (among many other areas) in order to pay for the bills’ centerpiece reductions to corporate and individual tax rates. This blog highlights changes that would affect tax-qualified savings and pension plans. In anticipation of changes in this area effective for tax years beginning after 2017, we recommend staying abreast of the tax proposals that could impact your business, and preparing for key management to be available to modify documents at the end of December.

The big news in the bills is that they do NOT (as widely speculated before their release) reduce the limit on pretax contributions to 401(k) plans, which is $18,500 for 2018. However, the House bill contains a number of smaller proposed changes that are intended to simplify plan administration, promote savings, and/or raise revenue, and the Senate bill proposes several targeted reductions to various tax-qualified retirement plan contribution limits. The House bill

While the Senate Committee on Finance promotes its bill as “Continu[ing] popular retirement savings programs such as 401(k)s and Individual Retirement Accounts, to help Americans build their retirement nest eggs and prepare for the future,” it does not include or address any of the proposed changes in the House bill’s relaxed rules for hardship withdrawals, loan balance rollovers, or nondiscrimination testing relief listed above. Rather, the Senate concentrates more on standardizing certain rules across all types of retirement plans, making targeted reductions in contribution limits and raising revenue. The Senate bill

The House bill already has been amended in multiple ways, and several amendments have been proposed in the Senate. We can expect more changes in the weeks ahead as Congress develops a final proposal that satisfies the key limitations imposed by the budget reconciliation process: In order to pass through a simple majority vote in the Senate, the legislation cannot increase the budget deficit by more than $1.5 trillion over a 10-year period and cannot increase the budget deficit by any amount after that period. Both proposals currently exceed the $1.5 trillion figure, and significant “sunset” provisions may be required to satisfy the latter requirement. Since most of the proposed benefits-related changes raise revenue, they may be difficult to remove given these constraints. We will keep you apprised of significant amendments to proposals affecting qualified plans.


Copyright © 2025 by Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP. All Rights Reserved.
National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 324