Unfair Contract Terms with Small Businesses: Implications for Australian Construction Industry


The unfair contract term prohibitions in Australia's Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) were recently extended to cover standard form contracts with small businesses.

The new law provides for unfair contract terms to be declared void and unenforceable. The relevant contract will then only continue to bind the parties insofar as it can operate without the unfair terms.

These changes may have significant impacts on the building and construction industry as terms typically found in construction contracts are likely to be subject to the prohibitions. We recommend that principals and contractors identify and review any standard form contracts they may have with small business counterparties that may be impacted by this new regime.

WHEN WILL THE PROHIBITIONS APPLY?

The law applies to a standard form contract entered into or varied on, or after, 12 November 2016 where:

These criteria are most likely to apply to subcontracts, supply agreements, plant hire agreements, consultancy agreements, minor works contracts and purchase orders involving small businesses.

A standard form contract is generally one which employs non-negotiated, standardised terms – that is, a contract offered on a "take it or leave it" basis, or one where there has been very little negotiation. When determining whether the contract is standard form, the court will take into account any imbalance in bargaining power between the parties, the extent of pre-contract negotiations, whether the contract is tailored to the specific circumstances of the transaction and the characteristics of the counterparty. The prohibitions are likely to apply to template contracts offered by companies and may even extend to standard forms such as Australian Standards.

WHAT IS AN UNFAIR TERM?

A term will be unfair if:

Examples of terms that are likely to be considered unfair include terms that enable one party, but not the other, to have the benefit of broad indemnities, to limit or exclude liability, to unilaterally vary the contract, or to terminate the contract without cause.

IMPACTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

Until the courts have handed down decisions under the legislation, there will be some uncertainty as to what will constitute an unfair term in a construction contract. However, conceptually an unfair term may include:

The practice of contractors passing through clauses from head contracts with principals to subcontractors is particularly relevant to the construction industry. In this situation, it will be important for a contractor to consider whether it has a legitimate business interest in including these types of terms in a contract with a small business. If there is an express pass-through obligation in the head contract, this may suffice as evidence of protecting a legitimate business interest.

WHAT THIS MEANS FOR YOU

If you have standard form contracts with small businesses that may be impacted by this new regime, it would be prudent to:


Copyright 2025 K & L Gates
National Law Review, Volume VII, Number 30