Powerful Changes to UK Insolvency Legislation – Are You Ready?


On 1 October 2015, several changes to UK insolvency legislation are coming into force. Insolvency practitioners and stakeholders should take note of the following key amendments to make sure they are up to date with these changes.

The amendments are the next raft of changes to insolvency law under the Small Business Enterprise and Employment Act 2015 and the Deregulation Act 2015. The previous changes, brought into force on 26 May 2015, are detailed here.

Fees

IPs seeking to charge on a time costs basis in an administration, CVL, compulsory liquidation or bankruptcy must provide creditors with an upfront estimate of their fees. The estimate has to be approved by creditors (including any subsequent increase in that estimate) prior to the IP being entitled to draw any funds from the insolvency. Further detail can be found here.

Assigning Claims

Liquidators and administrators will have the option of assigning any claim they may have against former directors or parties who have improperly received funds prior to the onset of insolvency. This will include TUVs, preferences, extortionate credit transactions and fraudulent or wrongful trading actions.

Administrations

Director Disqualification

Comment

The above amendments can generally be seen as empowering IPs, creditors and government bodies by providing them with additional tools that they can use to (i) recover assets on behalf of insolvent estates; and (ii) punish those whose conduct was culpable in the insolvency.

It remains to be seen how IPs and creditors will utilise the power to assign officeholder claims, given that IPs are still entitled to pursue such claims on a CFA/ATE basis providing that litigation funders are comfortable with the merits of the claim and the financial viability of the target. It may be that only those claims with a significant amount of risk are assigned, allowing the IP to make quick cash recoveries and passing on the speculative claims to those who have either the appetite or the resources to pursue it. There is of course also the additional danger that a cause of action could be assigned to a party who has no intention of pursuing the wrongdoer, either because they are connected or have another vested interest in the potential respondent to a claim.


© Copyright 2025 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
National Law Review, Volume V, Number 272