New Louisville “Ban the Box” Ordinance Covers City Contractors, Continues Growing Trend


Mayor Greg Fischer recently signed an ordinance that generally prohibits the Louisville Metro Government (hereinafter, “City”) and its vendors from inquiring into an applicant’s criminal history on the initial job application. 

The Ordinance joins an ever-growing patchwork of laws that curbs inquiries into or the use of an applicant and/or employee’s criminal history in employment decisions.  Indeed, approximately 10 states and 50 localities have “banned the box” and, although many of these laws only apply to public employers, several local ordinances cover government contractors in particular, including in Compton (CA), Richmond (CA), Hartford (CT), New Haven (CT), Indianapolis (IN), Boston (MA), Cambridge (MA), Worcester, (MA), Detroit (MI), Atlantic City (NJ), New York City (NY), and Pittsburgh (PA).  Nine other jurisdictions—Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Rhode Island, as well as the Cities of Philadelphia (PA), Newark (NJ), Buffalo (NY), Seattle (WA), and San Francisco (CA)—also have “banned the box” for private employers (either expressly or implicitly covering government contractors).  And, many more jurisdictions have imposed other limitations on criminal background checks for private and public employers, as well as for city vendors.

This post examines the obligations that vendors face under the new Louisville Ordinance and proposes best practices for compliance.

Coverage

Under the Ordinance a “vendor” is any person entity, contractor, or supplier of goods and/or services valued at $2,500 or more to the City.  The term “applicant” means any person considered for, or who requests to be considered for, employment by the City or a vendor.  And, “employment” is any occupation, vocation, job, or work for pay, including temporary or seasonal work, contracted work, contingent work, internship; or any form of vocational or educational training with or without pay (except appointed or sworn positions within the City).

Prohibitions and Requirements

Under the Ordinance, vendors who apply for business with the City may not include a “box” or a question regarding prior criminal history on the initial job application, nor may the vendor require the applicant to check or otherwise fill in a “box” or respond to an inquiry regarding prior criminal history on the initial job application, unless as otherwise provided or required by state and federal law.

The Ordinance further provides that the City may not inquire about an applicant’s conviction history until after it has determined that the applicant is otherwise qualified for the position (except as provided by state and federal law).  And that following such a determination, the City still must weight several mitigating factors.1  Vendors should seek to comply with these requirements imposed on the City, as part of the performance evaluation criteria when awarding City contracts is whether the vendor has adhered to the standards set forth in the Ordinance.

Exemptions

The requirements of the Ordinance do not apply to employment that involves:

Enforcement and Remedies

The City has the authority to deny, rescind, revoke, or terminate or not renew a contract with a vendor in non-compliance.  Moreover, a job applicant with the City or a vendor may file a complaint with the Louisville Human Relations Commission within thirty days after receiving a job application that violates the Ordinance.  The penalty for violating the Ordinance is a misdemeanor that carries a fine of no more than $50 or a period of imprisonment lasting no more than 30 days, or both.  Each day the violation continues constitutes a separate offense.

Takeaways

Unless otherwise exempted, vendors should refrain from asking questions relating to criminal history on the initial job application.  Vendors then should:


[1] These factors are similar to the ones enumerated in the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s 2012 Guidance and include the following: (i) nature of the crime and its relationship to the job; (ii) information pertaining to the degree of rehabilitation; (iii) time elapsed since the conviction or release, (iv) information produced by the person, or produced on their behalf, with regard to rehabilitation and good conduct; (v) age of the person at the time of occurrence of the criminal offense(s); (vi) gravity of the offense(s); (vii) probation or parole status; and (viii) public policy of the City to encourage the employment of ex-offenders.


© 2025 Proskauer Rose LLP.
National Law Review, Volume IV, Number 90