CFPB Study Finds Differential Treatment in the Small Business Lending Market


On November 13, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released a “pilot study” on the small business lending market revealing “significant disparities” in how lenders treat black and white small business owners. As part of its study, the CFPB conducted matched-pair testing at 50 bank branches in New York and Virginia using actors who posed as small business owners. Black participants were provided slightly more favorable financial profiles compared to the white participants. In many tests, the black and white participant each met with the same bank representative.

The Bureau examined four key aspects of the loan inquiry process: encouragement or discouragement to apply for a loan; information provided about requested loan products and potential steering to other products; the overall quality of treatment or customer service; and the amount of business and credit information requested. 

The study revealed two statistically significant disparities:

In its report, the Bureau encouraged “replication and extension” of its results, and noted that its work provides a framework for detecting differential treatment in commercial lending. The Bureau also identified several compliance management practices that may serve to mitigate the risk of a related ECOA violation for disparate treatment in a financial institution’s small business lending program, including active board and management oversight of the institution’s compliance management system framework, periodic review of relevant policies and procedures, and, regular monitoring and risk assessments. The report also encouraged institutions to do their own testing to assess if their policies and practices were ECOA compliant.

Putting It Into Practice: The report highlights the Bureau’s continued focus on ECOA-related compliance issues in the small business lending market. It also underscores how the enactment of the CFPB’s small business data collection rule will likely lead to more Bureau supervisory and enforcement actions in this arena. 


Copyright © 2025, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.
National Law Review, Volume XIV, Number 321