Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation.
Issues at Stake: 340B Covered Entities; Contract Pharmacy
- In a qui tam False Claims Act action alleging that defendants failed to charge accurate ceiling prices to 340B Covered Entities, the parties filed a joint stipulation, which the court approved.
- In two separate cases regarding a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, two plaintiff pharmaceutical companies filed combined replies in support of their motions for summary judgment and in opposition to cross motions for summary judgment.
- In a case regarding a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, a proposed intervenor filed an opposed motion to intervene, and the court set forth a notice of motion setting for both the parties and the proposed intervenor.
© 2025 McDermott Will & Emery
National Law Review, Volume XIV, Number 36