Mississippi Half-Step Uptown Toodeloo: Department of Health Proposes Robust Revisions to Medical Cannabis Regulations


Those long-awaited proposed revisions to the Mississippi Department of Health’s medical cannabis program regulations dropped last Thursday afternoon. Thankfully, the department released a red-lined version, highlighting exactly what they are proposing to change and add to the existing regulatory framework. And goodness is there a lot of red! The department is accepting comments from the public until October 2, 2023, via this form.

No “summary” can capture all the proposed changes, as many delve fairly deep into the technical side of operating a medical cannabis business. So, if you are operating in Mississippi’s program or working with and advising those who are, I implore you to spend the time necessary to review the 200-plus-page document and to submit comments in a timely manner. I suspect many will see some of the proposed changes as steps in the right direction, designed to encourage well-established and experienced operators with ample resources to maintain sophisticated operations and compliance programs, while many will view some of the proposals as means to hamper a medical cannabis program that needs all the momentum it can get. 

However these proposals are perceived, I hope the following is a good starting point at scratching the surface of the proposed changes that may prove most impactful if adopted. Also, keep in mind that these proposed regulations generally only govern “medical cannabis establishments,” which the regulations define to include every licensee under the program other than dispensaries. The department of revenue regulates dispensaries.

Notable Definition Adds and Changes

Practitioner/Patient/Caregiver Proposed Changes

Proposed Changes to Business Licensing, Background Checks, and Work Permits

Operational and Recordkeeping Requirements

Product Testing and Safety

Packaging and Labeling

Transportation

Variance Requests

Enforcement and Penalties


© 2025 Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
National Law Review, Volume XIII, Number 262