OSHA Withdraws COVID-19 Healthcare Emergency Temporary Standard, Vows to Use General Duty Clause


The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has announced that it is withdrawing most of the Emergency Temporary Standard for healthcare employers (Healthcare ETS) it promulgated more than six months ago.

The agency did not withdraw recordkeeping provisions requiring COVID-19 logs and case reports, as they were promulgated under separate provisions of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSH Act).

OSHA “strongly urges” continued compliance with the withdrawn standard, promising to use the discontinued requirements of the Healthcare ETS to “vigorously enforce” the General Duty Clause, a “catch-all” provision of the OSH Act covering hazards not addressed in promulgated standards. OSHA also promised to renew enforcement of general standards governing respiratory protection and personal protective equipment. OSHA will formalize its announcement with a notice in the Federal Register.

The Healthcare ETS included the following requirements:

Next Steps for Healthcare Employers

Considering the aggressive posture OSHA has taken with healthcare employers throughout the pandemic, healthcare employers would be wise to heed OSHA’s warning and continue to follow the rescinded Healthcare ETS as best practices for mitigating COVID-19 in the workplace. They should also be aware that they must continue to maintain COVID-19 logs of positive COVID-19 cases of employees, regardless of whether those cases are work-related (for employers with more than 10 employees) and report work-related COVID-19 inpatient hospitalizations within 24 hours and work-related fatalities within eight hours of learning of such events to OSHA (regardless of the number of employees). In addition, according to OSHA’s FAQs for its vaccine-or-test ETS, healthcare employers with at least 100 employees are required to comply with OSHA’s vaccine-or-test ETS because the Healthcare ETS is no longer in effect.


Jackson Lewis P.C. © 2025
National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 363