New York City Enacts Tenant Data Privacy Act


On May 28, 2021, New York City enacted privacy legislation that specifically targets owners of multifamily dwellings. The Tenant Data Privacy Act (TDPA) addresses perceived privacy issues surrounding the use of smart access systems in multi-family dwellings and is modeled, in part, after broader European and California privacy legislation. Among other things, it requires that all owners of Class A multiple dwellings that use smart-access systems (e.g., key cards, phone access, fingerprint) take the following steps:

The law goes into effect in 60 days, but multifamily residential landlords in New York City who own existing smart access buildings have been given an 18-month grace period, until Jan. 1, 2023, to come into compliance with the new requirements. Should a smart access building go online for the first time in, for example, August 2021 (after the law takes effect but before the grace period for existing smart access buildings ends), the statute will apply immediately.

The TDPA is one of the first statutes nationwide to regulate the collection and retention of data from residential multifamily “smart access” buildings. While some residential landlords in other jurisdictions, such as California, have been impacted by broad privacy legislation like the California Consumer Privacy Act, the TDPA is one of the first attempts by any jurisdiction to specifically mandate that residential landlords take steps to protect tenant privacy. As a result, it is likely to have an impact on both commercial and residential landlords, as well as landlords outside of New York City, that are concerned about best practices or similar legislation being enacted in other jurisdictions.

Key Provisions of the Bill

Scope

Privacy Policy

– the data elements to be collected;

– the names of any entities or third parties the owner will share such data elements with, and the privacy policies of any such entities or third parties;

– the protocols and safeguards the owner will provide for protecting such data elements;

– the owner’s data retention schedule;

– the protocols the owner will follow to address any suspected or actual unauthorized access to or disclosure of such data elements;

– guidelines for destruction or anonymization; and

– the process used to add and remove persons who have provided written consent on a temporary basis to the smart access system.

Data Collection

– the tenant’s name;

– apartment number and other amenities to which that tenant has access;

– preferred method of contact;

– biometric information, but only if the smart access system works on biometric data;

– identification numbers or passcodes used to gain entry;

– lease information; and

– time and method of building access; however, such information may only be used for security purposes.

Data Restrictions

– using data collected through a smart access system for any purpose other than to grant or monitor access;

– using a smart access system to limit the time of entry for any user, unless requested by a tenant;

– requiring a tenant to use a smart access system to access their apartment; or

– using any information gained through a smart access system to harass or evict a tenant.

– pursuant to a law, subpoena, or court order;

– to a disclosed third party that facilitates the operation of a smart access system, where the tenant has given express, informed consent in writing or through a mobile application;

– for utility data, to an entity employed or retained to improve the energy efficiency of the building; or

– to a guest of the tenant, as authorized by the tenant.

Data Safeguards

Data Retention and Destruction

Private Right of Action

Landlords should use the grace period to ensure they are in compliance with the TDPA before Jan. 1, 2023, and work with experienced counsel to draft or update privacy notices, review consents, or confirm that contracts with smart access system providers sufficiently protect owners of multifamily buildings.


©2025 Greenberg Traurig, LLP. All rights reserved.
National Law Review, Volume XI, Number 148