COVID-19: Planning for Wave of CARES Act Enforcement for Aviation Industry


As detailed in prior alerts,[1] the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 (the “CARES Act” or the “Act”) provides, among other things, financial assistance to the aviation industry through payroll support[2] (the “Payroll Support Program”) and through loans and loan guarantees[3] (the “Loan Program”).[4] Although such assistance is welcome in the wake of unprecedented losses, with ramped up rhetoric regarding “severe consequences” and possible “criminal liability”[5] for false certifications related to the Act’s loan programs, it is imperative that the aviation industry proceed with caution when receiving funds.

Wave of Enforcement Actions Likely Coming through Certifications

Potential Pitfall: Ongoing Compliance with Certifications. Application for and receipt of financial assistance does not come without risks, as evidenced by negotiations around the Payroll Support Program and ongoing confusion around the Act’s Payroll Protection Program. Since broad discretion is granted to the Secretary of the Treasury, the Department of the Treasury (“Treasury”) can enforce its positions, likely through breach of the terms of any agreements or upon evidence that the original certifications were fraudulent.

Thus, it is critical for passenger and cargo air carriers and related contractors (“Permitted Aviation Borrowers”) to understand the terms of undertaken Payroll Support and/or Loan Program agreements and to engage in ongoing compliance with respect to all certifications. Similarly, lenders and lessors need to understand the restrictions in order to best protect assets currently operated by Permitted Aviation Borrowers.

Indeed, the Payroll Support Program calls for certain “required assurances” to be eligible for support. Every recipient will be required to sign a Payroll Support Agreement (“PSA”) agreeing to comply with certain restrictions on staffing and pay cuts, stock buy-backs and dividend distribution, compensation exceeding $425,000, and continuation of service requirements.[6] The form PSA also requires:

While Treasury has not released a form agreement for the Loan Program, the program imposes similar restrictions on staffing and pay cuts, stock buy-backs and dividend distribution, and certain compensation levels. Per the terms of the Act, the Loan Program also requires Permitted Aviation Borrowers to demonstrate: (1) credit “is not reasonably available” elsewhere; (2) the loan is “prudently incurred”; (3) it incurred or is expected to incur covered losses jeopardizing continued operations; and (4) it is a U.S. business. As with the Payroll Support Program, Permitted Aviation Borrowers must certify the applications are true and correct. Permitted Aviation Borrowers will also likely be limited in their ability to incur additional debt obligations without consent and may need to give certain operation concessions.

SIGPR: Means of Monitoring and Investigating Compliance. To ensure Permitted Aviation Borrowers are complying with program terms, Congress created the Office of the Special Inspector General for Pandemic Recovery (“SIGPR”) with broad authority to conduct, supervise, and coordinate audits and investigations related to the CARES Act loan programs for a period of five years and with a budget of $25 million. Similarly, Congress tasked the Treasury Inspector General with auditing Payroll Support Program awardable amount certifications. Permitted Aviation Borrowers should expect that SIGPR will follow in the footsteps of the Office of the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program (“SIGTARP”). Established after the 2008 financial crisis, SIGTARP-supported investigations have resulted in 381 convictions and recovery of $11 billion.[7] For detailed examination of SIGTARP as a precursor of enforcement actions to come, review our analysis here.

Best Practices to Prepare for Coming Wave of Enforcement
It is imperative that Permitted Aviation Borrowers proceed with caution, understanding that oversight, investigations, and scrutiny may be coming from SIGPR, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and other regulators. Permitted Aviation Borrowers can prepare by:  

Notes
[1] This is the fifth installment in a series that delves into possible government enforcement efforts related to the CARES Act and that identifies best practices for companies in the wake of the nation’s largest emergency relief package. To learn more, please see “COVID-19: Looming False Claims Act Liability for Paycheck Protection Program Loans,” “COVID-19: Congressional Investigations and Pandemic Relief Oversight Mechanisms,” “COVID-19: Federal Stimulus Today, Federal Investigation Tomorrow: What TARP Can Tell Us about the Coming Wave of CARES Act Enforcement,” and “COVID-19: Labs Beware! – EKRA Expands DOJ’s Enforcement Arsenal in the COVID-19 Fraud Battle.”
[2] Subtitle B in Title IV of the CARES Act allocates funds for the continued payment of employee wages, salaries, and benefits, with up to $25 billion allocated to passenger air carriers, $4 billion to cargo air carriers, and $3 billion to contractors—a group which is narrowly defined. Demand for the Payroll Support Program has been so high that we understand that for passenger air carriers, in agreements over $100 million, thirty percent of the funds must be repaid as low-interest loans and that the carrier must issue stock warrants equal to ten percent of the value of the loan. Cargo air carriers receiving more than $50 million and contractors receiving more than $37.5 million will also be required to issue financial instruments to the government.
[3] Subtitle A in Title IV of the CARES Act allocated funds for loans and loan guarantees to provide liquidity related to losses incurred as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Act allocates up to $25 billion for passenger air carries, Part-145 certified repair station operators, and ticket agents; $4 billion for cargo air carriers; and $17 billion for businesses critical to maintaining national security. No Loan Program agreements have been finalized; however, many airlines have been advised of the amount of loans to be provided, and negotiations are ongoing.
[4] This is the third installment in a series focusing on the CARES Act and stimulus funding available to the aviation industry. To learn more, please see “COVID-19: UPDATED The Promise of the “CARES Act” on the Airline Industry” and “COVID-19: Air Carrier Work Support under the CARES Act.”
[5] See Mario Parker, Trump Says He’ll Ask Bigger Companies to Return Emergency Loans, WASH. POST (Apr. 22, 2020, 4:22 AM), https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/on-small-business/trump-says-hell-ask-bigger-companies-to-return-emergency-loans/2020/04/21/ce5056aa-841f-11ea-81a3-9690c9881111_story.html (threatening “severe consequences” for big companies that take money intended to help small businesses); Paul Kiernan, Mnuchin Says Big Companies Should Apologize for Taking Small Business Loans, WALL ST. J. (Apr. 28, 2020, 3:37 PM), https://www.wsj.com/articles/mnuchin-warns-larger-companies-against-seeking-coronavirus-funds-meant-for-small-businesses-11588083665.
[6] Dep’t of Treasury, Form Payroll Support Agreement, https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/Form-of-PSP-Agreement.pdf. The PSA may also contain individualized terms and conditions.
[7] Letter from the Special Inspector General, SIGTARP’s Quarterly Report, at 2 (Oct. 1, 2019 – Dec. 31, 2019), available at https://www.sigtarp.gov/Quarterly%20Reports/SIGTARP_First_Quarter_Report_Letter.pdf.
[8] Applications for the Payroll Support Program were due on April 3, 2020. Applications for passenger and cargo carriers for the Payroll Support Program were due on April 30, 2020, though Treasury may consider, in its discretion and subject to availability of funds, applications received after that date. Applications for businesses critical to maintaining national security were due on May 1, 2020, though Treasury may, in its discretion and subject to the availability of funds, consider applications received after that date.  


Copyright 2025 K & L Gates
National Law Review, Volume X, Number 125