Design Patents – Fundamental Additions to Cannabis Intellectual Property Portfolios


With the start of a new year and a new decade, Illinois became the 11th state to legalize recreational marijuana use—with many more states likely to follow suit. As a result of this recent legalization, cannabis companies operating in Illinois will be seeking protection for their technologies and brands. However, because cannabis is still considered an illegal substance at the federal level, the cannabis industry continues to face unique challenges in protecting intellectual property.

Many companies in the cannabis space turn to utility patents, trade secrets, trademarks, and copyrights to protect their technologies and brands. Yet, one form of protection—design patents—remains largely unused. Indeed, a recent search revealed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) has issued only 14 expressly cannabis-related design patents. Nevertheless, design patents may be a potentially powerful source of intellectual property protection that cannabis companies should consider.

Design Patents

Design patents protect the novel, non-functional, ornamental aspects of a product; in other words, design patents cover the unique way a product looks rather than the product’s function. If a product has a new and unique design (i.e. unique twists, grooves, ridges, etc.) that is not dictated by function, then design patents may be a viable option for protection that can complement functional features protectable by utility patents. When applicable, design patents provide a number of critical benefits, for instance:

Takeaways

Cannabis companies that manufacture ancillary products should consider obtaining design patents. Design patents can be used to protect the unique shape of vaporizers, pipes, bongs, tinctures, containers, and products that include novel designs featuring cannabis leaves or thematically similar design elements, whether or not any of those products are used with or for cannabis. Design patents are also optimal for replacement parts where owners expect the replacement part to mirror the original.


© 2025 Brinks Gilson Lione. All Rights Reserved.
National Law Review, Volume X, Number 45