Employee Privacy by Design: Guidance for Employers Beginning to Comply with the California Consumer Privacy Act


On September 13, 2019, the California Senate and Assembly unanimously passed an amendment to the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”) that places onerous obligations on employers and entitles employees to statutory damages for data breaches.  The landmark measure—AB 25—awaits Governor Newsom’s signature (or veto).  Regardless of whether AB 25 is signed into law, CCPA applies to employee data and employers have until January 1, 2020 to comply.  This article explores how the California Consumer Privacy Act impacts existing employee privacy rights and how employers can begin to develop a holistic privacy compliance program.

What Businesses Are Covered by the California Consumer Privacy Act?

The CCPA covers for-profit “businesses” who meet any one of the following thresholds:

Businesses do not have to be located in California for CCPA to apply.  CCPA applies if one of the foregoing thresholds is met and the company has “consumer” data covered by the Act.  Under CCPA, “consumers” is broadly defined as any “natural person who is a California resident.” (Civ. Code § 1798.140(g).)

Are Employees “Consumers” Under CCPA?

Since CCPA’s passage in June 2018, there has been fierce debate about whether “consumers” include employees.  AB 25 has laid that debate to rest and made clear that “a natural person acting as a job applicant to, an employee of, owner of, director of, officer of, medical staff member of, or contractor of that business” would immediately receive some rights under the CCPA. (Civ. Code § 1798.145(g)(1)(A).)  In 2021, such individuals would be afforded full rights under the CCPA. (Id. at § 1798.145(g)(4).)  If AB 25 is vetoed, then these individuals will receive all rights under CCPA on January 1, 2020.  For simplicity, when we refer to “employee data” throughout this article, we intend to include applicants, current/former employees, independent contractors and owners/directors/officers.

Understanding Employee Privacy Rights – The Beginning of the End

In the Golden State, employees have long enjoyed greater rights to privacy and statutory rights to inspect employment records.  Like all Californians, an employee’s right to privacy begins with the California Constitution and is bolstered with various laws.

Employment records are deemed confidential and protected from disclosure absent a subpoena and consumer notice. Civ. Code Proc. § 1985.6(e).  Employees also have a statutory right to inspect the following employment records: payroll records (Lab. Code § 226); documents signed during employment (Lab. Code § 432); records related to performance or a grievance (Lab. Code § 1198.5); and OSHA records for employee exposures to potentially toxic materials (Lab. Code § 6408(d).).  Failure to comply with these inspection rights gives rise to statutory damages.  For example, Labor Code 226 requires employers to allow inspection of payroll records within 21 days after a request is made, or else the employee is entitled to $750 in statutory damages.  Until now, an employee’s right to inspect employment records was limited to the foregoing categories.

CCPA dramatically expands employee rights in three significant ways: (1) it requires mandatory privacy notices and disclosures about the data collected by employers and purpose for collection; (2) it provides for statutory damages ranging from $100-750 if sensitive personal information is breached; and (3) it expands the right to request access/deletion of personal information.

Mandatory Employee Privacy Notices Beginning January 1, 2020

Employee privacy disclosures and appropriate use policies are nothing new.  Such policies are typically used to inform employees of workplace monitoring and diminish expectations of privacy. California courts reinforce the importance of employers maintaining and widely publicizing an employee privacy notice with respect to the use of technology in the workplace.  Courts have consistently upheld an employer’s right to monitor its employees’ computer use and override other privacy/confidentiality interests so long as there is a clear policy that employees have no expectation of privacy to data transmitted on company systems.

AB 25 will expand the scope and content of such employee privacy policies.  As of January 1, 2020 employee privacy notices must also disclose:

“Personal information” is omnipotently broad under CCPA and includes “information that identifies, relates to, describes, is capable of being associated with, or could reasonably be linked, directly or indirectly, with a particular consumer.” Civil Code 1798.140 (o)(1).  The definition goes on to identify 11 categories and data elements like “professional or employment-related information,” “education information,” “identifiers,” “characteristics of a protected category,” “biometric information,” “internet activity,” “inferences drawn regarding a consumer’s preferences, characteristics, psychological trends, predispositions, behavior, attitudes, intelligence, abilities, and aptitudes,” and “geolocation data,” to name a few.  Simply put, employers must disclose all categories of personal information it collects, its purpose, and how the information will be used.

Enforcement.  For now, there is no private right of action for failure to comply with these rights.  Instead, the Attorney General has sole and exclusive jurisdiction to investigate these violations.

Statutory Damages ($100-750 per Consumer) for Data Breaches Beginning January 1, 2020

In 2002, California passed the first data breach notification law in the world (see Civ. Code § 1798.81.5) and required businesses to “reasonably secure” personally identifiable information.  That law has evolved through the years, and today requires businesses to notify consumers (including employees) in the event any of the following sensitive personal information is accessed by an unauthorized user:

Enforcement.  CCPA gave the old law a new (and expensive) attitude by providing consumers with a private right of action to recover statutory damages ranging from $100-750 per incident, per employee, if any of the information listed in the breach statute is subject to unauthorized access or disclosure. (Civ. Code § 1798.150(a)(1).)  Similar to PAGA, CCPA allows consumers to bring a cause of action on behalf of others similarly situated which will make these claims ripe for class action litigation.

Employee Rights to Access & Request Deletion of Data Beginning January 1, 2021

In addition to the disclosures above, AB 25 amends the CCPA to extend full protection and statutory rights to applicants, employees, and independent contractors, including:

The obligation to comply with a deletion request is subject to numerous exceptions, including the right to keep data that must be maintained for other legal purposes or is consistent with the internal purpose for which it was collected.  The majority of employee or applicant data will likely fall into one of these two exceptions.

Enforcement.  For now, there is no private right of action for failure to comply with these rights.  Instead, the Attorney General has sole and exclusive jurisdiction to investigate these violations.

Beginner’s Mind:  What Employers Can Do to Prepare for CCPA?

Every day we get a chance to begin again.  Below is actionable guidance to kickstart your employee privacy by design program or update existing privacy programs:

The Beginning is Always Today

All good stories have a beginning, middle and end.  Employee privacy is no exception.  We find ourselves at the beginning of a movement that will continue expanding employee rights.  If AB 25 is signed, this will only provide a temporary reprieve for employers under the CCPA.  However, by January 1, 2021, all applicants, employees, and independent contractors will have full rights under the CCPA, which include the rights to request and delete information.


Copyright © 2025, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.
National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 263