FERC Adopts New Data Collection Requirements for Market Based Rate Sellers, Streamlines Market Power Analysis for Certain Organized Markets


On July 18, 2019, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) issued two final rules affecting entities that sell energy, capacity or ancillary services at market-based rates (MBR). 

The first final rule, Order No. 860, adopts new data collection requirements to create a public relational database that will contain information about MBR sellers, their generation assets, and their ultimate upstream owners.  FERC will use the relational database both to administer its MBR program and to assist its analytics and surveillance program within the Office of Enforcement.  Order No. 860 will become effective October 1, 2020.  MBR sellers must complete baseline submissions in the new database by February 1, 2021.

The second final rule, Order No. 861, eliminates the requirement that MBR sellers include indicative horizontal market power screens to obtain or retain MBR authority in certain organized markets.  Order No. 861 will become effective 60 days from its publication in the Federal Register.

Order No. 860 – Data Collection Rule

In Order No. 860, FERC largely adopts the data collection requirements proposed in the July 21, 2016, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NOPR), but provides a longer implementation schedule.  FERC declined to pursue the collection of additional information about certain “Connected Entities” (including entities that hold financial transmission rights or trade virtual products and individual traders), which was proposed in a 2015 NOPR.  The data collection requirements adopted in Order No. 860 include the following:

Order No. 861 – Streamlined Horizontal Market Power Analysis

In Order No. 861, FERC eliminates the obligation to submit horizontal (generation) market power indicative screens in order to obtain or retain MBR authority to sell energy, capacity or ancillary services in organized markets that have FERC-approved monitoring and mitigation mechanisms.  Such markets include those administered by PJM Interconnection, L.L.C., New York Independent System Operator, Inc., ISO New England Inc., and Midcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.  With respect to the markets operated by California Independent System Operator Corporation (CAISO) and Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP), FERC noted that those organized markets do not have capacity markets subject to FERC-approved monitoring and mitigation.  Therefore, the submission of indicative screens is still required to obtain or retain MBR authority to sell capacity in CAISO and SPP.  Order No. 861 does not change the obligation to submit indicative screens to obtain or retain MBR authority outside organized markets, including in the Western Energy Imbalance Market.

Implications

Order No. 860 introduces significant changes on what information MBR sellers must submit to FERC and how the information is provided.  MBR sellers should take advantage of the current implementation schedule to fully understand the new requirements and how FERC is developing the new relational database.  There are still many questions on the mechanics of the database submissions and FERC staff anticipates conducting regular outreach as the database is developed. 

The creation of a single relational database to house information currently reported through different systems (e.g., EIA, FERC asset appendix, EQRs) will render information about MBR sellers, their assets, and their owners more usable and accessible for FERC’s administration of both MBR and analytics and surveillance programs.  Order No. 860 confirms the importance of data accuracy that recent enforcement settlements have highlighted.  While FERC declined to adopt a specific “safe harbor,” MBR sellers should develop reasonable practices and procedures to demonstrate the exercise of due diligence when retrieving and reporting information in the relational database.


© 2025 Van Ness Feldman LLP
National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 204