A GDPR Update for Employers, Part II: Aligning HR Practices to Comply with National Legislation Implementing the GDPR


Much has happened since the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect on May 25, 2018. Many EU countries have enacted national legislation to implement and expand the requirements of the GDPR, while other developments have directly affected employers and created new obligations regarding the collection and processing of human resources (HR) data.

This is the second article in a four-part series examining national legislation, opinions, and guidelines that have been enacted or issued clarifying the GDPR’s requirements. The series also covers data protection impact assessments, claims alleging violations of the GDPR, enforcement actions, and fines that have been issued. Part one focused on threshold issues of GDPR coverage. This article addresses requirements enacted by individual EU countries that impose additional obligations related to the processing of HR data.

Although the GDPR was intended to provide a uniform set of data protection requirements across the EU, the GDPR contains several provisions, known as “opening clauses,” that expressly permit individual EU countries to implement additional and/or stricter requirements for certain types of data that employers typically process. For example, Article 9 of the GDPR provides that EU Member States may introduce further conditions and limitations on the processing of genetic data, biometric data, and health data. Article 10 of the GDPR provides that data concerning criminal convictions and offenses may be processed only if authorized by EU or EU country law. Finally, Article 88 permits EU countries to provide, either by law or by collective agreements, more specific rules regarding the processing of personal data in the employment context.

Several EU Member States have taken advantage of these opening clauses and have enacted legislation providing stricter or additional requirements for processing HR data:

Bulgaria

An employer may process HR data without an employee’s or job applicant’s consent if the collection and processing of the data is for employment relations; is required by the Labor Code, Health Act, or Social Insurance Code; or where the legitimate interest of the employer prevails over the interests and rights of employees, such as in the case of video surveillance for security purposes.

Croatia

Cyprus

Denmark

All organizations, including employers, must encrypt emails that contain sensitive personal data. “Sensitive personal data” under the GDPR includes data concerning a person’s racial or ethnic origin, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, trade union membership, genetic information, biometric data ideology, union membership, sexual orientation, beliefs, or health, sex life, or sexual orientation.

France

Germany

Examples of a “legal or economic benefit” to an employee include an employer’s implementation of an occupational health management or support program or an employer’s permitting private use of company IT systems. Examples of aligned interests include situations in which employers and employees work together to add employees’ names and birthdays to a company birthday list or use photographs of employees for a website. When determining whether consent is voluntary, the timing of the consent must be considered. For example, prior to the conclusion of an employment contract, employees are subject to greater pressure to consent and, therefore, such consent may not be voluntary.

Greece

Employers may process criminal history data when absolutely necessary for, among other purposes, determining eligibility for employment, processing data in the employment context, and establishing, exercising, or defending legal claims.

Ireland

Luxembourg

Employers may ask prospective employees to provide an extract of their criminal record in the recruitment process. The data can only be used for recruitment or human resources purposes and cannot be kept for longer than one month.

The Netherlands

Employers may process criminal history data if the individual provides explicit consent or the processing of such data is necessary for litigation purposes.

Poland

Slovakia

An employer may process sensitive data when necessary for the purposes of carrying out and exercising the obligations and specific rights of the employer or employee in the areas of labor law, social law insurance, social protection, or public health insurance.

Spain

Sweden

Employers may process social security numbers without employee consent when the processing is necessary for security or authentication purposes.

United Kingdom

The Article 30 record of processing that requires an appropriate policy document must include the following information: the condition relied upon, the extent to which the processing is lawful under the GDPR, and, where applicable, the reasons for not complying with the policy.

Part three of this series will address the obligation under the GDPR to conduct data protection impact assessments of processing activities that are “likely to result in a high risk to the rights and freedoms” of individuals.


© 2025, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.
National Law Review, Volume IX, Number 114