USCIS Reverses Course, Allows STEM OPT Students to Work at Third-Party Sites


U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) has revised its website and announced that it will now allow F-1 students participating in the optional practical training (OPT) extension for individuals in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) to work at third-party sites as long as the student’s employer can demonstrate that it has a bona fide employment relationship with the student, in addition to meeting all other training obligations.

Although the agency’s announcement describes the revision as a “clarification,” in actuality, it appears to be a reversal of the restrictions it published on its website in January 2018, which, among other things, prohibited the employment of STEM OPT students anywhere other than at the employer’s own place of business. The January 2018 changes caused considerable confusion, in part because they were made without any formal notice or announcement, leaving many to question whether a simple website revision should be given the weight of an official policy change or an amendment to the regulations. Adding to the confusion was the fact that USCIS’s new threshold for establishing a bona fide employment relationship exceeded the requirements of the 2016 STEM OPT final rule. It was also unclear how the new restrictions would be implemented and whether they would be applied retroactively to training plans that had already been approved.

The latest changes mark a return to policies that more closely mirror the regulations. Below is a list of the key revisions to USCIS’s STEM OPT website:  

While this is good news for students and employers, employers may still want to exercise caution when placing a student at a third-party work site. Employers may want to consider how they will document their bona fide employment relationships with their STEM OPT students. This is likely to be on employers’ minds given USCIS’ new unlawful presence policy that puts students at risk of accruing unlawful presence if they fall out of status, in this case by potentially violating the terms of their STEM OPT extension.   


© 2025, Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C., All Rights Reserved.
National Law Review, Volume VIII, Number 235