Cannabis has gone from a fringe business to a booming industry, but it remains one of the most complicated sectors to manage when financial distress sets in because its product is illegal under federal law. That leaves distressed operators with limited options with one of the most important tools being state court receivership.

Receiverships can stabilize an insolvent business, preserve value for creditors, and create a pathway to sell assets or restructure. But when cannabis is involved, the challenges multiply: licensing, regulation, cash-only operations, and shifting market conditions all complicate the process. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for attorneys, lenders, and investors alike. A cannabis receivership does not just involve a distressed business; it also means navigating overlapping regulatory frameworks, heightened scrutiny from state authorities, and unique tax obligations under federal law.

Why Receivership Matters for Cannabis

As Eric Peterson of  Spencer Fane puts it, “Distressed cannabis businesses, if they’re to undergo an insolvency-type proceeding, have to use a receivership or other state court process.”

Receiverships can be initiated by owners, lenders, or regulators, and they allow an independent third party to manage or sell the business.  Some states have adopted the Uniform Commercial Real Estate Receivership Act or have developed their own Receivership Act, giving courts and receivers clearer authority. Others rely on older equitable doctrines, which can leave more discretion but also less predictability.

Setting Up the Case

According to Daniel Garfield of Fairfield and Woods, filing a cannabis receivership looks similar to other litigation, but with some unique considerations including:

• Licensing: Every state has its own rules, and not all allow a receiver to take over cannabis operations.
• Corporate Structure: Cannabis companies often separate cultivation, manufacturing, and retail into different entities, sometimes across multiple states.
• Tax Complications: Because of Internal Revenue Code §280E, cannabis businesses can’t deduct most expenses, creating unusual entity structures to allocate costs.
• Secured Claims: UCC filings and tax liens can complicate whether receivership adds value.

The question of what is actually being included in the receivership, i.e. the cannabis business as a whole or just certain properties, can make matters very complicated, very fast.

Taking Control

Once appointed, the receiver’s first job is to stabilize operations.  As part of this process, receivers will typically:

• Review all active licenses (cultivation, retail, manufacturing, transport).
• Assess insurance coverage, payroll, employee status, and security measures.
• Examine whether there are unpaid taxes or regulatory fines.
• Determine whether operations should continue to preserve value. It’s also important to understand that in certain states ceasing operations may force a surrender of the license(s).

Eric Moraczewski of NMBL Strategies underscores the importance of understanding state specific conditions in determining value and the path ahead:  “In a limited license state, you could have a company that never sold anything that still has immense value. In an unlimited license state, you need operations to create value, because licenses can be purchased easily.”

Cannabis is not one market; licensing is where state-to-state variation makes or breaks value.

For example:

• Michigan: Licenses are tiered by plant counts with each license type coming with different obligations and values.
• Missouri: Limited licenses create significant scarcity value, making licenses themselves the asset. These licenses can sell for millions even if the business never turns a profit.
• Colorado: Licenses are abundant, so value tends to lie in operations and real estate, not paper permits.

The regulatory focus is also important. “In Missouri,” Moraczewski notes, “their first and foremost interest is user safety. They want to make sure cannabis isn’t crossing state lines and has been properly tested.”  Additional regulatory priorities may also include tax compliance and preventing diversion to the black market.

Selling the Assets

Receiverships often culminate in a sale of assets. Frank Simon of Simon PLC describes the process in practical terms: “We create a digital data room with financials, equipment lists, real estate documents, and licenses, then list assets on sites like LoopNet and BizBuySell, along with social media outreach.”

Key steps in the sale process include:
1. Preparing complete data rooms for buyer due diligence.
2. Requiring proof of funds, often in cash, to avoid long-term financing risks.
3. Securing court approval of the purchase.
4. Obtaining regulatory approval for license transfers.

Because receivers are court-appointed neutral parties, they often bring credibility and transparency to a sale process that could otherwise be clouded by distrust between lenders, owners, and regulators.

Timing Matters

Timing is critical in cannabis sales and it is important to be mindful of regulatory delays. For example, in Colorado license transfers can happen in one to two months whereas in Missouri, only recently have transfer times dropped from 18-24 months to five or six.

Receivers sometimes use management agreements to bridge this gap, allowing buyers to run operations while awaiting license approval. This approach ensures continuity of business and prevents value erosion.

Distribution and Discharge

After the sale, the receiver must distribute proceeds, pay creditors, and close the estate. Simon explains: “Usually it’s two motions: one for approval of the sale, and one for a final receiver report, which shows who got paid and what assets were sold.”

Protecting the receiver from liability is also crucial. Courts generally grant immunity if actions were taken under the court’s order, but parties often attack the receiver fees. Garfield warns, “That’s where the pain is going to be.”

Best practice? File monthly fee statements for court approval. This not only improves transparency but also builds a record that makes later challenges less credible. Some receivers also hold back a retainer from estate proceeds to cover potential disputes over fees, especially if litigation is anticipated.

Key Takeaways

Receiverships may be the only realistic option for cannabis companies in distress. They are complex, but with the right strategy, they can preserve value and provide a clear exit path. Handled correctly, they can salvage value from a business that otherwise has no viable federal remedy.

For operators, receivership offers breathing room: it can keep employees paid, protect licenses from lapsing, and prevent creditors from rushing to dismantle the business. For lenders and investors, it provides a court-supervised process that ensures fairness, oversight, and the potential for recovering at least some of their investment. Regulators also benefit when a receiver steps in, because public safety and compliance are prioritized while the business transitions to new ownership.

The path is not without risk. Timing, regulatory delays, and tax complications under federal law mean that receiverships require creativity and persistence. Still, the process demonstrates that even in one of the most heavily regulated industries in the US, distressed companies can be restructured or sold in a way that preserves jobs, satisfies creditors, and protects consumers.

To learn more about this topic view Operating and Selling a Cannabis Company in Receivership. The quoted remarks referenced in this article were made either during this webinar or shortly thereafter during post-webinar interviews with the panelists. Readers may also be interested to read other articles about state court receiverships.

This article was originally published here.

©2025. DailyDAC^TM, LLC. This article is subject to the disclaimers found here.