HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
The Economic Loss Doctrine: Pipeline Company Prevails in Texas Appeal
Wednesday, July 22, 2026

A Texas appellate court recently applied the economic loss doctrine to reverse a nearly $10 million jury verdict in favor of a pipeline contractor.

The dispute arose from the construction of a 32-mile natural gas pipeline in West Texas. After disagreements developed during the project, the contractor sued the project owner for breach of contract, and that claim ultimately settled. The contractor also sued the owner’s project management (PM) firm, alleging that the firm negligently misrepresented that the owner would pay certain invoices that ultimately went unpaid. 

That claim proceeded to trial, where the jury awarded the contractor nearly $10 million in damages. On appeal, however, the PM firm argued that the contractor’s negligent misrepresentation claim was barred by the economic loss doctrine. Last week, the Texas Court of Appeals agreed, reversing the jury’s verdict and rendering judgment in favor of the PM firm (see Asset Risk Management, LLC v. Comal Energy Services, LP, — S.W.3d —-, 2026 WL 2023233 (Tex. App. – Houston [1st Dist.] 2026)).

The court’s decision rests entirely on the economic loss doctrine, a common law principle recognized in some form by most states. In Texas, the doctrine generally prevents a party from recovering in tort for losses that are purely economic or contractual in nature. It applies when the alleged harm arises from a party’s failure to perform under a contract and consists only of the loss of the contractual bargain. 

To recover under a tort theory, a plaintiff generally must identify an independent legal duty that exists apart from the contract or demonstrate a non-economic injury, such as personal injury or property damage. As with many common law doctrines, however, the economic loss doctrine has numerous exceptions. For example, it generally does not bar claims for fraudulent inducement. The doctrine also varies from state to state and, because it is a product of the common law, continues to evolve through judicial decisions.

A full copy of the court’s decision is available here

HB Mobile Ad Slot
HTML Embed Code
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot
 
NLR Logo
We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters.

 

Sign Up for any (or all) of our 25+ Newsletters