8th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit sits in St. Louis Missouri. The Courthouse is the Thomas F. Eagleton United States Courthouse. In addition to the Court of Appeals, the Eighth Circuit spans over 6-US states, including: Missouri, Arkansas, Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, and South Dakota. Although the Eighth Circuit originally had additional states situated in the geographic-region, Congress passed legislation which broke the Circuit into 2-separate circuits, which is known as the Tenth Circuit today.

The courthouses in each state are further broken down into regions. The Eastern District court in Arkansas sits in Little Rock and Western District court is in Fort Smith. The Northern District court in Iowa is in Cedar Rapids, and Southern District is in Des Moines, IA. The District of Minnesota court sits in Minneapolis, the Eastern District court is in St. Louis (Appeals court), and Western District is in Kansas City, MO. The District of Nebraska court sits in Omaha. The Northern District court in South Dakota is in Fargo, and Southern District court is in Sioux Falls, SD.

Currently there are 11 active judges on the bench in the Eighth Circuit and 7 senior judges. The Chief Justice is Lavenski Smith, and the Circuit Justice is Neil Gorsuch. A number of precedent-setting decisions have come from the Eighth District. Frosty Treats Inc. v Sony Computer Entertainment of America, Inc. (2005) is one of those cases. In the trademark case, the court held that Frosty Treats (largest US ice cream company) was not “distinctive” or “famous enough” to receive immunity protections from being used in a violent video game.

The National Law Review covers cases such as Frosty v Sony which deal with trademarks and branding, as well as several other categories and case law. Bankruptcy proceedings, tax related cases, government actions, indemnity cases, state actions, appointments, and State and Federal agency news. The National Law Review also covers the latest news pertaining to legislation, patents, election, and general-information in the legal community.

Custom text Title Organization
Jul
22
2019
Big ERISA Decisions on the Horizon—SCOTUS to Review Third ERISA Case this Term McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
19
2019
$500 a Call Not an Immutable Sum Where TCPA Multiplier Yields Billions Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
17
2019
Eighth Circuit Finds that Telemarketer’s Plausible Belief of Consent to Calls Supports Radical Reduction of Statutory Damages Award Faegre Drinker
Jul
17
2019
Agreement to Arbitrate Acknowledged, Not Accepted, Eighth Circuit Says Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
17
2019
Feds Exhibit Continued Interest in Prosecuting Illegal Relationships Between Laboratories and Marketers Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jul
16
2019
Groundbreaking: Eighth Circuit Confirms TCPA Statutory Damages Were Unconstitutional Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
16
2019
AT&T Sues Consulting Firm for Trade Secret Theft and Breach of Contract Jones Walker LLP
Jul
16
2019
Eighth Circuit Vacates Confirmation Over Lack of Personal Jurisdiction Carlton Fields
Jul
10
2019
Failure to Specifically Challenge “Delegation” Clause in Arbitration Agreement Means Motion to Compel Arbitration “Must Be Granted” Carlton Fields
Jul
9
2019
Court Overturns Suspension of Employee Refusing Work Due to Safety Concerns Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jul
9
2019
Supreme Court Rules on FOIA and the Protection of Sensitive Company Information Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Jul
8
2019
Cross-Plan Offsetting in the Balance: UnitedHealth Group, Inc. Petitions the Supreme Court to Allow Cross-Plan Offsetting; Response to be Filed on or before July 31, 2019 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
5
2019
Supreme Court Update: Kisor v. Wilkie (No. 18-15), Food Marketing Institute v. Argus (No. 18-481), United States v. Haymond (No. 17-1762) Wiggin and Dana LLP
Jun
28
2019
Eighth Circuit Affirms Preliminary Injunction Blocking Physician Practice Acquisition in North Dakota Robinson & Cole LLP
Jun
24
2019
Appellate Court Affirms Decision to Block Medical Merger Bracewell LLP
Jun
21
2019
A Brief Review of What’s Happening in TCPA Insurance Coverage Case Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
20
2019
Antitrust Enforcement Update: Spotlight On Physician Transactions McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
17
2019
Seventh Circuit: Obesity Alone Is Not A Disability Under the ADA (US) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
3
2019
8th Circuit Decision in SuperValu Class Action is a Reminder that Injury and Damages Aren’t the Same Thing Ballard Spahr LLP
May
21
2019
Valued Policy Law and Total Loss Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
20
2019
Former Employee's Release Agreement Bars ERISA Claim Against ESOP Fiduciary McDermott Will & Emery
May
6
2019
FTC Confirms Holder Rule Ballard Spahr LLP
May
3
2019
Insurance Policy Language Used to Challenge Consent Judgments with Covenants Not to Execute Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Apr
18
2019
Eighth Circuit Rules Against Third Party Administrator in Cross-Plan Offsetting in Group Health Plans Jackson Lewis P.C.
Apr
9
2019
Peterson v. UnitedHealth Group Inc. Challenges the Practice of Cross-Plan Offsetting Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2019
District Court Decision Rejects Commerce Clause Challenge to Missouri’s Retailer Wine Shipping Laws McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
11
2019
Eighth Circuit Rejects FCA Claim for Failure to Allege Actual Claims for Payment McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
4
2019
Employer Still Wins – Even Though Job Eliminated and Work from Home Request is Denied Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
1
2019
Eighth Circuit Casts Doubt on Cross-Plan Offsetting for ERISA Health Plans Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Feb
28
2019
Trademark Owner's Fate Sealed Tight After Finding of Fraud on PTO McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2019
Licensor's Non-Material Breach Doesn't Excuse Royalties Non-Payment McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
19
2019
Flesh Eating Bacteria Ate My Homework Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
14
2019
Four Circuits Agree: Regular and Reliable Attendance is an Essential Job Function Polsinelli PC
Feb
8
2019
Eighth Circuit Rejects Cross-Plan Offsetting McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
4
2019
Peterson v. United HealthCare decision illustrates limits on discretion of plan administrators’ when interpreting plan terms Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins